# On terminal objects and colimits

I’m currently working through Mac Lane’s and Moerdijk’s “Sheaves in Geometry and Logic”, and came upon the following two sentences in a proof (p. 43):

Note that when is representable the corresponding category of elements has a terminal object—the element of . Therefore the colimit of the composite will just be the value of on the terminal object.

It was not immediately obvious to me why the colimit of a functor should be the image of the terminal object, though I got the intuition that we automatically had a cocone. Sheldon Axler gives the following advice to students in the preface of his “Linear Algebra Done Right”:

You cannot expect to read mathematics the way you read a novel. If you zip through a page in less than an hour, you are probably going too fast.

Taking this advice to heart, I set out to prove:

**Proposition.** *Let be a functor and a diagram with
terminal object . Then the colimit exists and .*

In other words, if a diagram has a terminal object, then the colimit is trivial: the colimit is the image of the terminal object.

*Proof.* Let be the
natural transformation given by
where is the unique morphism in given by the
terminality of . Then this clearly defines a cocone from
to .

Let be any other cocone on . Then there exists a morphism from to , namely, . Moreover, we claim this morphism makes the following diagram commute for all in :

Indeed, since the are , this is immediate from the naturality of . We claim is the unique such map. Let be any other morphism making the diagram commute. Then in particular, the diagram

commutes. But . So .

We thus conclude that the colimit exists and is exactly . **Q.E.D.**

**Corollary.** *Let be a functor and a diagram with initial
object . Then the limit exists and .*

Comments: To comment on this post, send me an email following the template below. Your email address will not be posted, unless you choose to include it in thelink:field. An md5sum of it will however be sent to Gravatar to obtain any possible avatar.`To: Ryan Kavanagh <rak@ryanak.ca> Subject: [blog-comment] /academia/2016/03/28/On-terminal-objects-and-colimits post_id: /academia/2016/03/28/On-terminal-objects-and-colimits author: [How should you be identified? Usually your name or "Anonymous"] link: [optional link to your website] Your comments here. Markdown syntax accepted.`

## 1 Comment

## nicolas

You might also want to check CWM chapter X lemma 1 for the dual property